Skip to content
Powered by Pagefind
English
Selection Guides

Reflective Sheeting Structure vs ASTM Type

Why glass bead and microprismatic structure are not ASTM D4956 Types, how to read performance classes, and how to keep RFQs and catalog copy accurate.

8/21/2026 ReflectivePlus Specs Team Last updated: 8/21/2026 2 min read
Reflective Sheeting Structure vs ASTM Type

Is glass bead the same as ASTM Type I?

No. Glass bead / enclosed-lens and microprismatic / cube-corner describe optical structure. ASTM D4956 Type is a performance classification determined by testing. Final Type for a SKU follows its test report.

Two axes buyers mix up

AxisExamplesUse it for
StructureGlass bead, microprismatic, cube cornerManufacturing/optics discussion; secondary filter
Performance classASTM Type I, III, IV, VIII, IX, XI; EN RA1/RA2Specification, compliance, RFQ primary axis
Marketing gradeEngineer grade, HIP, microprismatic trafficCatalog navigation labels

Rules we enforce in every ReflectivePlus page

  1. Never write “glass bead = Type I”.
  2. Never use Diamond Grade as a generic category (3M trademark spanning multiple Types).
  3. RA1/RA2 are EN performance classes — name the standard/version.
  4. Print compatibility and outdoor durability are per SKU (and often per color/geometry).
  5. Every live SKU must publish Type via TDS/test report — demo pages mark placeholders clearly.

Catalog implication

ReflectivePlus uses performance grade as the primary category axis. Structure, application, processing, and size are facets and landing pages. That matches how export buyers arrive: with a Type/RA in hand.

Related Reading

Was this helpful?

Email